About the Journal
    Abstract.Full Text
    Guidelines for Authors
    Manuscript Review Form
    Transfer of Copyright       Agreement
     Manuscript Submission       Checklist
Manuscript Review Form
Home >journal> Manuscript Review From
 
rtyrty
 
 








(Quantitative Study)

Title:________________________________________________________

Guideline of Review

 

Content Area

Very

Poor

Poor

Accept -able

Good

Excell-ent

Not Appli

-cable

Subjects

1. Is selection of subjects appropriate?

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Is the presented subject researchable? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Is the research subject new and creative?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Introduction

1. Is the significance of the study stated?

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Are the subjects and purpose of the study specific and clear?

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Are the relationships between major concepts and previous investigations logically stated?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Methods

Instrument

1. Is the instrument valid?

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Is the instrument reliable?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subjects

3. Is the subject appropriate for the purpose of the study?

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. Is the sampling appropriate for the study?

 

 

 

 

 

 

5. Is the rational for the sample size mentioned?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Data Collection & Data Analysis

6. Is the ethical consideration during the process stated?

 

 

 

 

 

 

7. Is the data collection procedure appropriate for the study?

 

 

 

 

 

 

8. Is the data analysis  appropriate for the study?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Results

1. Is the statistics concisely stated?

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Are interpretations consistent with the results?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion

1. Is the discussion based on the results?

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Does the author separately state results and interpretations of the researcher?

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Is the discussion clearly and logically stated?

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. Does the author sufficiently review the relationship between results and previous investigations?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conclusions & Suggestions

1. Are the summary and conclusion properly stated?

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Do the results contribute to practice, research, education and policy?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Others

1. Is the reference list prepared according to APA format?

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Is the abstract of the study concisely reflective of the study?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conclusion

Not Acceptable 

Review after Revision

Accept after Revision

Acceptable

Excellent

Overall, do you think this study is acceptable for publication?

 

 

 

 

 





Date: _________________________        Reviewer:_____________ Signature:_____________________

 



(Qualitative Study)

Title: _________________________________________________________________

Guideline of Review

 

Content Area

Very

Poor

Poor

Accept -able

Good

Excell-ent

Research Questions

1. Is the research process clearly stated?

 

 

 

 

 

2. Is  significance of research problems provided?

 

 

 

 

 

3. Are questions specific and interview questions       proper?

 

 

 

 

 

4. Is the choice of research method consistent with     the questions?

 

 

 

 

 

5. Is the philosophical point of view about research     method presented?

 

 

 

 

 

Data collection & Analysis

 

1.Are the training and preparation to exclude the       bias of researcher stated adequately?

 

 

 

 

 

2. Is data collection procedure (e.g.: interview,         observation etc. ) appropriate?

 

 

 

 

 

3. Is the sampling procedure specifically stated?

 

 

 

 

 

4. Is the ethical consideration during the process       stated?

 

 

 

 

 

5. Are all processes of data analysis properly           stated?

 

 

 

 

 

6. Is the process of data collection and analysis        interacted?

 

 

 

 

 

7.Are other researcher's critique and participants'      identification included?

 

 

 

 

 

Results

1. Do interpretations of the data answer to the            research questions?

 

 

 

 

 

2. Are the results clearly stated?

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion

1. Is the discussion about the identified phenomenon      properly stated?

 

 

 

 

 

2.  2. Does the author provide the implications (research, e      education, and practice) of the results? 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Does the author suggest the direction of the           following research?

 

 

 

 

 

Conclusions

1. Is the conclusion properly stated?

 

 

 

 

 

Others

 1. Is the reference list prepared according to APA       format?

 

 

 

 

 

 2. Is the abstract of the study concisely reflective of      the study?

 

 

 

 

 

Conclusion

Not Acceptable 

Review after Revision

Accept after Revision

Acceptable

Excellent

Overall, do you think this study is acceptable for publication?

 

 

 

 

 


Date: _______________________   Reviewer:_____________ Signature_____________________







(Review Article)

Title: _________________________________________________________________

Guideline of Review

Content Area

Very

Poor

Poor

Accept -able

Good

Excell-ent

Not Appli

-cable

Theme

1. Is the selection of themes appropriate?

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Are the questions of the study new and creative?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Significance & Purpose

1. Are the research questions and the purpose of      the study specific and clear?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Literature Review

1. Does the review include major concepts related      to the research ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Are the primary sources mainly used?

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Are current literatures used?

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. Does the review include the critical analysis of

  the researcher?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Results & Discussion

1. Are interpretations and discussion of the findings     appropriate?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conclusions & Suggestions

1. Are the summary and conclusion properly stated?

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Do the results contribute to practice, research,      education and policy?

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Do conclusions contribute to improvement of      professionality in subject areas of the             research?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Others

1. Is the reference list prepared according to        APA format?

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Is the abstract of the study concisely reflective     of the study?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conclusion

Not Acceptable 

Review after Revision

Accept after Revision

Acceptable

Excellent

Overall, do you think this study is acceptable for publication?

 

 

 

 

 



Date: _________________________        Reviewer:_____________ Signature ____________________







(Concept Analysis)

Title: _________________________________________________________________

Guideline of Review

Content Area

Very

Poor

Poor

Accept -able

Good

Excell-ent

Not Appli

-cable

Subjects

1. Is selection of research subject appropriate for the purpose of concept analysis?

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Are researchable concepts presented?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Significance & Purpose

1. Is the necessity of concept analysis logically developed?

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Is the selection of concept analysis method appropriate?

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Is the purpose of the study consistent with concept analysis method?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Literature Review

1. Are the literatures from all the disciplines for which concepts are used reviewed conductively?

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Is the comparative analysis on attributes and definitions of research concepts provided?

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Is a working definition of the research concept presented (hybrid model)?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Field Works

(Hybrid Model)

1. Does the research consider the analytic units that are appropriate for the level of research concept?

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Is the subject appropriate for the analytic unit?

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Is the researcher's training and preparation sufficiently described?

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. Is the ethical consideration during the process stated?

 

 

 

 

 

 

5. Does the author use appropriate questions to define attributes? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6. Is the data collection procedure appropriate for the study?

 

 

 

 

 

 

7. Is the process of data collection and analysis interactive?

 

 

 

 

 

 

8. Is the validity of the analytic results confirmed?

 

 

 

 

 

 

9. Are attributes and definitions of concepts which are identified by field works presented?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Results

1. Is the comprehensive analysis of attributes and  definitions of research concepts presented?

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Does the author present a model case, antecedents,  consequences, and empirical referents of research concept?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conclusions & Suggestions

1. Is the conclusion properly stated?

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.Does the author provide the implications (research, education, practice) of the results?

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Does the author suggest the directions of the following research?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Others

1. Is the reference list prepared according to APA format?

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Is the abstract of the study concisely reflective of the study?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conclusion

Not Acceptable 

Review after Revision

Accept after Revision

Acceptable

Excellent

Overall, do you think this study is acceptable for publication?

 

 

 

 

 



Date: _________________________        Reviewer:_____________ Signature____________________



 
 





맨 위로